Irfan Rashdi used this prompt during his schoolbased practice while training at London Metropolitan University (London, UK) to become a secondary school mathematics teacher. The prompt is adapted from the Prime Climb hundred chart. The inquiry has the potential to develop reasoning about the following topics:
 prime numbers
 prime factors
 multiples
 divisors
 structure and pattern
 squares and square roots; cubes and cube roots
 indices.
Notice and Wonder Amie Albrecht (senior lecturer and applied mathematician at the University of South Australia, Adelaide) writes in this post about using the Prime Club hundred chart with a group of 50 preservice teachers. She asked them to consider the chart individually and tell her five things they noticed. Amie then compiled a list of a hundred different ideas that the group came up with, organising them under headings that include structure, the number one, prime numbers, composite numbers, square numbers, prime factors and divisor and factororiented.
Extending the inquiry The prompt can be extended by using (or revealing) more of the original chart. Irfan suggests the possibility of students from years 6 to 8 filling in their own chart once they have understood the original prompt. This might be done in conjunction with prime factor trees or another method of deriving the prime factors of positive integers. As Irfan says, this approach "promotes learning by doing maths" and encourages students who become "more switched on when interactive activities are introduced." The prime factors inquiry developed from an Inquiry Maths workshop at London Metropolitan University in January 2017. Alan Benson, the mathematics PGCE tutor, encouraged trainee teachers to try an inquiry lesson during their teaching practice. Irfan Rashdi went on to devise his own prompt and Jhahida Miah added to the Inquiry Maths model by requiring students to take on different roles (see this slide).
 Developing mathematical reasoning Irfan Rashdi reports on an inquiry based on the prime factors prompt he carried out with his year 9 class during his second teaching practice: During the inquiry, I planned to observe the students' development of mathematical reasoning, individually and in pairs. At the outset, I posed questions: What do you notice? What do you wonder? The purpose of this approach was to promote outofthebox thinking in contrast to traditional maths classrooms. The inquiry promoted a variety of responses as opposed to just one solution; it allowed students to learn by following different pathways (both successful and unsuccessful) as opposed to reaching a single right or wrong answer; and it encouraged students to become more flexible because there were no teachercontrolled parameters. The pictures of the students' questions and observations (below) show how ideas developed at the start of the lesson. Even though the thoughts and findings might seem basic or obvious, the students were in the process of engaging themselves more in deeper thinking. In the next part of the inquiry, I led a class discussion about types of numbers, including factors and multiples. Without me making the link to the prompt explicit, the students' were able to gain a greater insight into its structure. This process extends the idea of Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development  that is, the difference between what a learner can do without help and what he or she can do with help. The teacher stresses the importance of the latter part of the definition, focusing the discussion on what the learner can do with help. I then required students to inquire into the colour, pattern and structure of the prompt in order to notice and record ideas about prime numbers, composite numbers, square numbers, prime factors, multiples, and divisors. I observed that students initially studied individually and, generally, they did not establish a clear idea about the prompt. It was when I introduced structure into the inquiry by focusing the students' attention on key mathematical features of the chart that students became engaged in the creative and outofthebox thinking that I had hoped to develop. They became more confident in expressing their ideas as they made connections between their existing (intuitive) knowledge and and the object of the inquiry. In this way, the class constructed new knowledge.
